Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°íÁ¤¼º º¸Ã¶Ä¡·á¿¡¼­ °ñÀ¯Âø¼º ÀÓÇÁ¶õÆ®ÀÇ °æ»çµµº¯È­¿¡ µû¸¥ º¯À§¿Í ÀÀ·Â¿¡ °üÇÑ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒÀû ¿¬±¸

A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS ON THE 3-UNIT FIXED PROSTHESIS SUPPORTED WITH A NATURAL TOOTH AND ANGLE VARIABLE IMPLANT

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úÀ̽ÄÇÐȸÁö 1992³â 12±Ç 1È£ p.58 ~ 88
°íÇö, ¹Ú³²¼ö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
°íÇö ( Ko Hyun ) - Kyung Hee University College of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
¹Ú³²¼ö ( Park Nam-Soo ) - Kyung Hee University College of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics

Abstract


The purpose of this study was to analyze the deflection and stress distribution at the supporting bone and it¡¯s superstructure by the alteration of angulation between implant and it¡¯s implant abutment. For this study, the free-end saddle case of mandibular first and second molar missing would be planned to restore with fixed prosthesis. So the mandibular second premolar was prepared for abutment, and the cylinder type osseointegrated implant was placed at the site of mandibular second molar for abutment. The finite element stress analysis was applied for this study. 13 two-dimensional FEM models were created, a standard model at 0¡Æ and 12 models created by changing the angulation between implant and implant abutment as increasing the angulation mesially and distally with 5¡Æ unittill 30¡Æ. The preprocessing, decording, solving and postprocessing procedures were done by using FEM analysis software PATRAN and SUN ? SPARC2GX. The deflections and von Mises stresses were calculated under concentrated load (load 1) and distributed load (load 2) at the reference points. The results were as follows : 1. Observing at standard model, the amount of total deflection at the distobuccal cusp-tip of pontic under concentrated load was largest of all, and that at the apex of implant was least of all, and the amount of total deflection at the buccal cusp-tip of second premolar under distributed load was largest of all, and that at the apex of implant was least of all. 2. Increasing the angulation mesially or distally, the amounts of total deflection were increased or decreased according to the reference points. But the order according to the amount of total deflection was not changed except apex of second premolar and central fossa of implant abutment under concentrated load during distal inclination. 3. Observing at standard model, the von Mises stress at the distal joint of pontic under concentrated load was largest of all, and that at the apex of implant was least of all. The von Mises stress at the distal margin of second premolar under distributed load was largest of all, and that at the apex of implant was least of all. 4. Increasing the angulation of implant mesially, the von Mises stresses at the mesial crest of implant were increased under concentrated load and distributed load, but those were increased remarkably under distributed load and so that at 30¡Æ mesial inclination was largest of all. 5. Increasing the angulation of implant distally, the von Mises stresses at the distal crest of implant were increased remarkably under concentrated load and distributed load, and so those at 30¡Æ distal inclination were largest of all.

Å°¿öµå

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸